Role

Lead Product Designer

Company

Trade Me

Client

Trade Me

Project Overview

During my observation of the Trade Me Help Center, I identified notable inconsistencies in the visual design of navigation and components as customers delved into various topics and posts from the home page. This prompted me to investigate whether these inconsistencies posed a challenge for customers and if there were potential opportunities to enhance their experience while seeking information within the Help Center.

My primary hypothesis was that the existing navigation layout lacked consistency and did not provide an intuitive visual hierarchy for users. While customers might have adapted to the non-ideal workflow and managed to navigate the Help Center, there was a likelihood that their journey could be significantly improved with a more cohesive and intuitive design. By addressing these issues, we aimed to create a more seamless and user-friendly experience for customers seeking assistance and information on Trade Me.

I started by mapping out the current navigation of the Help Center

Looked at previous insights surrounding the Help Center and Community forums

Made assumptions to test

Conducting the usability study

Objectives:
- Identify common usability issues within the Help Center UX.
- Uncover inconsistencies and inefficiencies in visual navigation.
- Gain insights into customer behavior when searching for content.
- Understand distinctions in user interaction between mobile and desktop platforms.
- Compile a participant list for testing, comprising a mix of new and returning users.
- Analyse top visited articles and their bounce rates in Google Analytics to assess the accessibility of desired information for customers.

Summary of study findings

- 23/43 participants successfully navigated to the success fees page.
- The home page has a bad usability score of 43/100.
- The time taken to navigate through the entire task of navigating to the success fees help article on the Trade Me Help center was extremely long on avg. at 36.3 seconds.
- The majority of participants felt they navigated to the correct place to learn about success fees, however 10 of the 39 participants did not click through to the success fees page, compared to 29 participants who said yes and correctly navigated to the success fees page.
- Of the testers that answered Yes but hadn’t navigated to the correct place, 5 of them claimed to visit the help center once or twice a month and only 2 participants had never visited the help center.
- Of the 29 participants who correctly navigated to the success fees page, 19 visited the help center once or twice a month, 8 had never visited and 3 claimed to visit once or twice a week.  
-There seems no correlation between being familiar with the Help Center and not in the success rate of navigating the Help Center.
- The blank looking fees landing page has a long view time on average of 13 seconds and a maximum view time by 1 participant at 22 seconds. However only 3 of the 43 participants navigated via that path.
-Top requests for improvements are larger font size and more visual cues

Suggested improvements

Projects